NATHURAM v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE (S.D.M.), TEHSIL SALON, RAIBAREILLY AND OTHERS
A227/4164/2025 · 2025-07-15
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151081 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40390 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4164 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nathuram Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate (S.D.M.), Tehsil Salon, Raibareilly And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard Sri Anil Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent No.s 1 and 2.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. It has been submitted that the proceedings under Section 28 of U.P. Land Revenue Act were initiated on the application submitted by one Shiv Charan who is predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner and the same was allowed by Additional Collector, vide his order dated 26.2.2018.
4. The grievance raised by the petitioner in the present petition is that despite passage of nearly six years and the map having been accordingly corrected, the same has not been executed till date and accordingly prays for a suitable direction to the competent authority to execute the order dated 26.2.2018.
5. Learned Standing counsel has raised a preliminary objection stating that the petitioner has equally efficacious remedy of appeal under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual to execute orders of revenue authorities.
6. The petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid facts and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach competent authority.
7. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual.
8. In case, any such proceeding is initiated the authority concerned shall proceed to consider and decide the same, expeditiously, in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 RKM. Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench