1 / 3 2025:CGHC:14690 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2048 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Singh S/o Chandramani Singh Aged About 38 Years R/o Sitapur, Post- Sitapur, Shivmandir Para, Dist.- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Of Department Of Public Works, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief, Department Of Public Works, Sirpur Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Ambikapur, Dist.- Sarguja (C.G.) 4 - Executive Engineer, Division Level Laboratory, Public Works Department, Sarguja Division, Ambikapur, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Shukla, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Ms. Akanksha Verma, Panel Lawyer SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.03.28 10:47:23 +0530 2 / 3 (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 27/03/2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner against the inaction on the part of the respondents. The petitioner is working on the post of Laboratory Assistant as daily wage employee in Public Works Department, Ambikapur since 01/09/2012, however, till date, the case of the petitioner has not been considered by the respondents for regularization of his service. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 20/02/2025 (Annexure P/4) to the respondent No.4/ Executive Engineer, PWD, Ambikapur claiming regularization of his service which is still pending and the same is not being decided till date. He further prays for a direction towards the respondent authorities to consider his representation by which he is claiming regularization of his service. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State, on instruction, would submit that if the representation dated 20/02/2025 submitted by the petitioner is still pending, the same shall be decided within the stipulated period. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. In view of the above submission made by learned counsel for the State and looking to the fact that the petitioner has been working 3 / 3 in the respondent Department since last 13 years and he has already submitted a representation seeking regularization in his service, the respondent No.4/ Executive Engineer, Division Level Laboratory, PWD, Ambikapur is directed to consider and decide the representation dated 20/02/2025 submitted by the petitioner within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar