+APHC010189662025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 9623/2025 Between: 1. C.SOLOMON,, S/O. C.BARNABAS AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC SECRETARY, CENTRAL BOARD / EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, CSI RAYALASEEMA DIOCESE,R/O. CSI COMPOUND, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, JAMMAIAMADUGU URBAN POLICE STATION. 4. DR K P RAVINDRA, S/O. K.P. DEVA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. DIRECTOR / SECRETARY CSI AROGYAVARAM MEDICAL CENTRE AROGYAVARAM MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 5. PEYALA ISAC VARA PRASAD, S/O. PEYALA ABRAHAM AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC BISHOP R/O. 2/15-1, CSI COMPOUND R.S. ROAD, KADAPA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P VASU SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. K B RAMANNA DORA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer: “…..to issue a WRIT or Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondent No.3 in interfering the day-to-day affairs of the administration of Campbell Hospital, Jammalamadugu by causing inconvenience with collusion in Respondents 4 and 5, thereby troubling this petitioner / Secretary, Central Board / Executive Committee, CSI Rayalaseema Diocese, as well as to the staff in all cadres of the same Campbell Hospital, Jammalamadugu, in curtailing the petitioner's vested powers, rights as contemplated under the CSI RD Constitution 2003, thereby consequentially direct the Respondent No.4 be restricted in any manner along with Respondent No.5 in Campbell Hospital, Jammalamadugu,of involvement unilaterally, arbitrarily with not to interfere as against the vested right of functions of the petitioner,……” 2. Sri P.Vasu Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that as per the instructions from the party, they wanted to withdraw this Writ Petition. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the submission made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to recourse his remedy before the appropriate forum according to law. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.09.2025 MH 5 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 20 WRIT PETITION NO: 9623 of 2025 Dt.04.09.2025 MH