Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15107 (KAR)

SHRI SUNDAR REDDY v. KARNATAKA SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD

WP/2730/2021 · 2025-01-09

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:776 WP No. 2730 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 2730 OF 2021 (GM-SLUM) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI SUNDAR REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, S/O VENKATARAM REDDY, 2. SMT. NEELAVATHI@LEELAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, W/O SHRI.SUNDAR, BOTH R/AT NO.29, THATECH HOUSE SHED, RAGHAVENDRA SLUM RESIDENTS, SY NO.29, YEDIYUR-NAGASANDRA VILLAGE, DODDAMORI, BEHIND VEERANJANEYA SWAMY TEMPLE, K.R.ROAD, VIDYAPEETA ROAD, BSK II STAGE, 14TH CROSS, SHASTRI NAGAR, BANGALORE. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJULU NAIDU.G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. KARNATAKA SLUM CLEARANCE BOARD, NO.55, ABHAYA COMPLEX, 3RD FLOOR, RISALDAR STREET, SESHADRIPURAM, BENGALURU-560 020. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARAPARK WEST, BANGALORE-560 020. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:776 WP No. 2730 of 2021 (BY SRI. SANJAY., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. B.B.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R1; SRI. K.N.PUTTEGOWDA., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Pavan.G.N., counsel on behalf of Sri.Nagarajulu Naidu.G., for the petitioners and Sri.Sanjay., counsel on behalf of Sri.B.B.Patil., for respondent No.1 have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: I. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representations dated:20.04.2015 and 31.10.2019 made by the petitioners to the first respondent and further direct the first respondent to pass orders on the representations dated:20.04.2015 and 31.10.2019 vide Annexures-L and Q. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:776 WP No. 2730 of 2021 II. Issue a direction to the first respondent to issue Hakku Patra to the petitioners in respect of site No.29 of Raghavendra Slum, Yediyur-Nagasandra village, behind Veeranjaneya Swamy Temple, K.R.Road, BSK II Stage, 14th Cross, Shastri Nagar, Bangalore as was issued to the similarly situated persons in the slum. Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are not pressing prayer No.II. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioners about non pressing of prayer No.II is placed on record. As far as prayer No.I is concerned, counsel for the petitioners submits that a Mandamus may be ordered directing the first respondent to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners on 20.04.2015 and 31.10.2019. Counsel for the petitioners on instructions submits that though the representations are made back in the year 2015 and 2019 the same are not considered as of today. Counsel for respondent No.1 submits that an appropriate order may be passed. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:776 WP No. 2730 of 2021 3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care. 4. The petitioners grievance is that they made representations in the year 2015 and 2019 and the same is not considered as of today. Hence, a Mandamus is ordered directing the first respondent to consider the representations submitted by the petitioners vide Annexures-L and Q in accordance with the law if not considered as of today, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45