M/S LALLU PRASAD YADAV THRU. PROPRIETOR LALLU PRASAD YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF GRAMYA VIKAS U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/6612/2025 · 2025-07-22
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151059 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41819-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6612 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/S Lallu Prasad Yadav Thru. Proprietor Lallu Prasad Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Gramya Vikas U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Puttan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard The petitioner claims to have performed some work / job for the Block headed by the Block Development Officer, Block Haidargarh, District - Barabanki as claimed, reliance has been placed to Annexure 3 in this regard. However, payment is not made on the ground that the file is not available. Let the petitioner approach Opposite Party No.3 by way of an application, who shall get the facts verified in the light of the claim of the petitioner and if it is found that the work has been performed for which the petitioner is entitled for any payment then the needful shall be done. If the file is not traceable, it should be traced out or reconstituted, as the case may be. However, if the petitioner is not entitled to such payment the reason should be communicated to him. Let this exercise be completed within two months. The writ petition stands disposed of. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Rajan Roy,J.] Order Date :- 22.7.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench