NANDLAL v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6810/2025 · 2025-07-28
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 151053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43229-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6810 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nandlal Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard Shri Avneesh Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner alleges some action by the Lekhpal resulting in obstruction of passage of the petitioner from his house. If it is so, then, the remedy is not under Article 226 of the Constitution of India but elsewhere, especially as, Ms. Akansha Dubey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State says that as per the Lekhpal's report the alleged passage in fact is the private land of another person, namely, Ms. Krishna Devi. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is
disposed of. . (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 28.7.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench