Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15105 (UTT)

Karan Alias Chandan Singh v. State Of Uttarakhand

CRJA/36/2018 · 2025-12-09

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:10912 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS CRJA No.36 of 2018 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Gurbani Singh, learned Amicus Curiae for the appellant. 2. Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand/respondent. 3. Appellant was convicted u/s 363, 366 and 376(2)(n) and sentenced to 07 years imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation 06 months additional imprisonment; 07 years imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- with default stipulation 06 months additional imprisonment and 10 years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.25,000/- with default stipulation 01 year additional imprisonment respectively, vide judgment and order dated 26/28.04.2018 passed by learned Special Judge (POCSO)/Sessions Judge, Tehri Garhwal in Special Sessions Trial No.27 of 2016 State Vs. Karan @ Chandan Singh. 4. Vide order dated 17.11.2025, learned State Counsel was directed to bring on record a fresh custody report of appellant. 5. Today, learned State Counsel passed on to this Court written instruction dated 17.11.2025, which is taken on record. 6. According to the said instruction, appellant has already served out the sentence imposed upon him and he has been released on 16.06.2025 from jail on 2025:UHC:10912 completion of sentence imposed upon him. 7. In view of the said instruction, the present criminal jail appeal has rendered infructuous. 8. Accordingly, the present criminal jail appeal is dismissed as infructuous. However, liberty is given to appellant to recall this order, if he wants to challenge his conviction. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.12.2025 PN