Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40140 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7562 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pankaj Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Basic Education Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the respondents-State No.1 & 3, Shri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 and Shri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 & 5. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that by means of the impugned order dated 30.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-1 to the petition, the petitioner has been transferred within the district by indicating that his transfer is on the basis of his own request. Contention is that although the petitioner had filled in his option online but he did not submit the documents in support thereof consequently the respondents could not have acted upon the same and in having transferred the petitioner by purporting it to be a transfer on his own request and thus, aforesaid transfer order so far as it pertains to the petitioner is liable to be quashed. On the other hand, learned counsels appearing for the respondents support the impugned order by contending that Clause 9 of the Government Order dated 16.06.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-5 to the petition, itself indicates that as soon as a teacher submits online application, his application would be treated to be completed. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.2 then the respondent no.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. It is made clear that joining of the petitioner would be subject to the decision that may be taken by the competent authority in pursuance to this order. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench