Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15103 (RAJ)

RAMSWAROOP YADAV v. R P S C AJEMER andANR

CW/9069/2016 · 2025-09-08

Anand Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:36089] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8574/2016 Sanjay Choudhary S/o Birdi Chand Choudhary, aged about 27 years, R/o Near Saraswati School, Ramner Road, Gandhi Nagar, Madanganj, Kishangarh, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajathan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8623/2016 Vijay Chaudhary S/o Laxman Singh Chaudhary, aged about 34 years, R/o Ward No.40, Chankyapuri, Sujangarh, District Churu. ----Petitioner Versus Rajathan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8722/2016 Manish Kumar Saini S/o Shri Sunder Lal Saini, aged about 22 years, R/o Saini Bhawan, Post Office Road, Gandhi Nagar, Abu Road, Sirohi, District Sirohi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus Rajathan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8777/2016 Ram Chandra Meel S/o Jawahara Lal Meel, aged 35 years, resident of Village Alakhpura Godaran, Deenwa Jatan, Tehsil Laxmangarh, Dist. Sikar 332 311 (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Personnel (DOP), Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9013/2016 Smt. Vinod Kumari W/o Late Shri Suresh Kumar Yadav D/o Shri Ramawatar Yadav, aged about 37 years, resident of B-315, Budh Vihar, Alwar District Alwar, Rajasthan. [2025:RJ-JP:36089] (2 of 3) [CW-8574/2016] ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through Secretary. 2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9069/2016 Ramswaroop Yadav S/o Shri Kishan Lal Yadav, age 29 years, R/o Village Post Loharwara, Tahasil Chomu, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer through its Secretary. 2. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Personnel, Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9274/2016 Ashok Kumar Gurjar S/o Ramesh Chand Gurjar, aged about 23 years, R/o Village Jindo Ka Pura, Post Kamari, Tehsil Nadauti District Karauli. ----Petitioner Versus Rajathan Public Service Commission through its Secretary, Ajmer ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9836/2016 Prakash Choudhary S/o Shri Hanuman Sahay Choudhary, aged about 26 years, R/o 256, Shiv Vihar, Road No.5, Vishwakarma Area, Jaipur (Roll No.930988) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Personnel, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, through its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondent S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10214/2016 Sarita Kumari, Widow of late Mahendra Choudhary, D/o Durga Ram, aged 40 years, resident of Plot No.2, Rajmata Ka Mohara, [2025:RJ-JP:36089] (3 of 3) [CW-8574/2016] Near Veterinary College, Bikaner. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Secretary, Department of Personnel (DOP), Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini with Mr. Aamir Khan Mr. Rahul Saini for Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya Mr. Vijay Poonia Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 08/09/2025 Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that during pendency of the writ petition, names of the petitioners have been recommended by the respondent- Rajasthan Public Service Commission for appointment to the State Government. In view of such recommendation, learned counsel for the petitioners have got instructions not to press the writ petitions at this stage. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, these writ petitions filed by the petitioners are dismissed as having become infructuous. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /144-152