1 / 2 2025:CGHC:14685 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2025 of 2025 1 - Ram Khilawan Banchor S/o Harakh Ram Banchor Aged About 65 Years R/o H.No. E-47, Indraprasth Colony, Phase-1, Near Shivam Educational Academy, Raipura, Dist. Raipur, (C.G.) 2 - Jagannath Prasad Tiwari S/o Late Jagdamba Prasad Tiwari Aged About 64 Years R/o H.No. 66, Amapara, Nagar Palika Kanker, District- Uttar Bastar Kanker (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dist Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Secretary General Administration Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dist Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Secretary Public Works Department, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dist Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Secretary Department Of Finance, Accounts And Treasury, Govt. Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Dist Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Executive Engineer Public Works Department (Building And Road), Kanker Division, District- Uttar Bastar, Kanker, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.03.28 10:47:23 +0530 2 / 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Dy. Advocate General (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 27/03/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioners are seeking for issuance of an appropriate direction to the Respondent authorities for considering the claims of the Petitioners for grant of leave encashment in terms of the provisions of the Chhattisgarh Work- Charged/Contingency Paid Employees Leave Rules, 1977. 2. According to the Petitioners, they have made their respective claims in the light of the recent decision passed by this Court rendered in W.P.(S) No.3870/2021 (Faguvaram Patel & Others Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 30.9.2022, wherein similar claim of the Petitioner therein has been allowed. The said decision also stands affirmed by the Division Bench in W.A. No.119/2023, decided on 20.6.2023. 3. Given the said facts, the present Writ Petition is disposed of at this juncture, directing the Respondent Authorities to immediately process the claims of all similarly placed persons herein in the light of the aforesaid decision passed by this Court on the same subject-matter, within an outer limit of 120 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. 4. With the aforesaid direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar