Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 151011 (ALL)

MODH. ASLAM THRU. HIS FATHER RAHMATULLAH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT., LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

CRLRD/253/2023 · 2025-04-25

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:24128 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 253 of 2023 Revisionist :- Modh. Aslam Thru. His Father Rahmatullah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt., Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Rakesh Dwivedi,Abhishek Kumar,Ajay Veer Singh,Akhilesha Nand Pandey,Mayank Pandey,Ravi Kant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Veer Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist as well as learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist, at the very outset has submitted that even though application for modification was allowed, but the name of Prosecutrix could not be erased completely as the same has been mentioned at various places in the memo of revision. It is prayed that he may be permitted to withdraw the present revision with liberty to file a fresh revision. 3. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in case present revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the revisionist to file fresh revision. 4. In view of above, present criminal revision is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 5. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order to learned counsel for the revisionist as per rules. Order Date :- 25.4.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench