Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40456 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 754 of 2025 Applicant :- Arjun @ Chattu Mallah @ Chattur Mallah @ Pattu Mallah Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shankar Lal Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Shankar Lal Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Harsh Kumar Verma, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. On the oral request of learned counsel for the applicant, he is permitted to correct the name of police station in paragraph 7 (v) of the application. 3. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in five cases in which the applicant has been granted bail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in ten criminal cases and has been granted bail by the High Court as well as Sessions Court, the details of cases are as under :- "i. Case Crime No. 750 of 2024, under Sections 305-A, 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S., Police Station Ramnagar, District Barabanki. ii. Case Crime No. 751 of 2024, under Sections 305-A, 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S., Police Station Ramnagar, District Barabanki. iii. Case Crime No. 156 of 2025, under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Ramnagar, District Barabanki. iv. Case Crime No. 752 of 2024, under Section 109 B.N.S., Police Station Ramnagar, District Barbanki. v. Case Crime No. 284 of 2024, under Sections 309(4), 317(2), 317(4) B.N.S., Police Station Ghunghter, District Barbanki." 5. The learned A.G.A has opposed the application stating that the applicant has a long criminal history and, therefore, he is not entitled to receive any discretionary relief by this Court. 6. In response to this objection, the learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant be permitted to submit a personal bond and two sureties for 50,000/- each for release in all the five cases. 7. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018) the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. 8. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each and atleast one of the two sureties will be a local surety which shall be treated to be valid in all the five cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench