APHC010190162020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 12227/2020 Between: KARRA SUDHAKAR., S O JACOB. AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. R 0 5-98- 57.6 AND 9S-577. BEKKER COMPOUND. BRV-XLIPET_ GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT. N'ELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ARUNDALPET POLICE STATION_ _ARUNDALPET. GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not properly investigate into the matter in FIR No. 44812017, dt. 13 12.2017 on the file of Police Station, Arundalpet, Guntur Town, Guntur District and referring it as a false case is as illegal, arbitrary. unjust and unconstitutional and consequently direct the ri respondent to re-investigate the matter in FIR No. 448/2017, dt. 13-12-2017 on the file of Police Station, Arundalpet, Guntur Town, Guntur District or in the alternative direct the 2nd respondent to get it investigate the crime No.448 I 2017 dt,13-12-2017 on the file of Police Station, Arundalpet, Guntur Town, Guntur District through a competent officer.” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that, after completion of investigation in Crime No.448 of 2017 on the file of Arundalpet Police Station, Guntur Town, having found no incriminating evidence in support of the case of the Petitioner, Respondent No.3 referred the same as ‘false’. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that, no further orders are required in this matter and the petition may be disposed of. 3. None represented the Petitioner. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the Petitioner is at liberty to work out his remedies before appropriate forum in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:28.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.12227 of 2020 Dt.28.08.2025 Dinesh