Mallimoggala Lakshmi Kantham v. State ofAndhra Pradesh,
WP/9677/2025 · 2025-04-17
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15098 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010191012025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY ,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 9677/2025 Between: Mallimoggala Lakshmi Kantham ...PETITIONER AND State Ofandhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following Order:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the 2nd respondent in not acting on the petitioner’s representation dated 27.03.2025.
3. The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the Home submits that the representation of the petitioner dated 27.03.2025 will be considered by the respondents, as per the law.
2
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to disposed off the Writ Petition at the stage of admission itself, directing the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 27.03.2025, in accordance with law and as per the procedure contemplated under Section 173(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, (for short, “BNSS”), if not already considered.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed off. There shall be no order as to costs.
6. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated : 17.04.2025 BMS