SUNIL KUMAR DIXIT @ SUNIL DIXIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9358/2023 · 2025-09-24
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150962 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9358 of 2023 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Sri Bharat Kumar Dixit, the learned counsel for the applicant states that the application has become infructuous. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as having become infructuous. September 24, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shailesh Kumar Srivastava, Bharat Kumar Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s): G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Sunil Kumar Dixit @ Sunil Dixit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench