[2025:RJ-JP:16201] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 905/2025 1. Deepak Sahariya Son Of Rajesh, Resident Of Balaji Thana Todabhim District Karauli (Raj) (At Present Accused Appellant Confined In District Jail Karauli) 2. Nisha Wife Of Deepak Sahariya, Resident Of Balaji Thana, Todabhim District Karauli (Raj) (At Present Accused Appellant Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. Sunil Kumar Son Of Raghuveer Singh, Resident Of Bhedadi Police Station Bandikui At Present Junior Engineer Payla Police Station Todabhim District Karauli (Raj) ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Lalit Gautam with Mr. Rajeev Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 16/04/2025 1. This criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the SC/ST Act’) has been filed on behalf of the appellants being aggrieved with the order dated 02.04.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge S.C./S.T. (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Karauli (hereinafter to be referred as ‘trial court’) in FIR No. 0404/2024 registered at Police Station Todabhim, District-Gangapurcity for the offences under Sections 121(1), 132, 324(4), 324(5) of BNS and Sections 3(1) (S), 3(1)(r) & 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act whereby the trial court has dismissed the bail application filed on behalf of the appellants. [2025:RJ-JP:16201] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-905/2025] 2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material on record. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants have falsely been implicated in this case. Appellants are behind the bar since 02.04.2025. There is no criminal antecedents against the appellants. He further submits that investigation/trial of the case may take considerable time. Therefore, the appeal presented by the present appellants may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer made on behalf of the appellants. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the appeal filed by the appellants under Section 14-A of SC/ST Act. 6. Accordingly, this criminal appeal filed under Section 14-A of SC/ST Act is allowed and order dated 02.04.2025 passed by the learned trial court is set aside. It is directed that appellants- Deepak Sahariya Son Of Rajesh, and Nisha Wife Of Deepak Sahariya shall be released on bail provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J sunita/258