TAUFEEK v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6758/2025 · 2025-07-21
Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150956 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41519-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6758 of 2025 Petitioner :- Taufeek Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Chhaya Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh,Sandip Kumar Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J.
1. Heard.
2. Petitioner has preferred a statutory appeal against the order passed under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 which has been filed within time prescribed as informed.
3. If it is so then there is no occasion for the opposite parties to proceed to demolish the house or structure in question as, after all, if this is permitted, then, what will remain to be considered in the appeal. Let the appeal bearing No.T202504710000 said to have been filed before the Collector, Amethi be considered and decided at the earliest. Till disposal of the appeal, the aforesaid exercise of demolition/ removal of encroachment shall remain in abeyance.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. (Manish Kumar,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 21.7.2025 Shanu/- Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SHANU SUMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench