VIKASH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. PRIN. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
NA528/753/2025 · 2025-07-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150952 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40427 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 753 of 2025 Applicant :- Vikash Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Prin. Home Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Sheel Nidhi Shukla,Priya Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Sri Sheel Nidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ashok Srivastava, learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS, the applicant has challenged validity of order dated 11.02.2025 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police/ Executive Magistrate South, Lucknow in Case No. 80/2024, Vikas Kumar v. State of U.P. He has further prayed for release of vehicle No. UP32 UN6562 in favour of the applicant.
3. Learned AGA has raised a preliminary objection that the applicant has got a statutory remedy of filing a revision against the order before the Session judge.
4. Confronted with the aforesaid preliminary objection, the
learned counsel for the applicant has stated that he does not want to press the present application as the applicant would avail the statutory remedy of filing revision before the sessions judge.
5. Accordingly, the instant application is dismissed as not pressed leaving it open to the applicant to avail the statutory remedy of filing revision before the session court. In case such a revision is filed before the Session Judge, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Pradeep/- Digitally signed by :- PRADEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench