Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150929 (ALL)

Mohammad Yaseen and 3 Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Lucknow and 6 Others

A227/4089/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40042 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4089 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mohammad Yaseen And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of Uttar Pradesh Through Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue Department, Lucknow And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sajjad Husain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Sajjad Husain, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents is dispensed with. 3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of to decide the application dt. 14.06.2025 filed U/S 67A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with Rule 2(a) of the U.P. Abadi Survey and Abhilekh Sangrah Niyamawali, 2020 within a stipulated time period and to declare and recognize the petitioners' residential possession over the aforesaid land as eligible U/S 67A of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 read with Rule 2(a) of the U.P. Abadi Survey and Abhilekh Sangrah Niyamawali, 2020. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petition would be sufficiently met in case competent authority, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Considering the fact that the application was filed only in June, 2025 of which proceedings are underway and from the perusal of the writ petition, there is no disclosure of any extra ordinary circumstance as to why this Court should exercise its jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the trial court to decide the same expeditiously. 6. This Court is conscious of the fact that in a routine manner directions cannot be passed to the trial court/concerned authority to decide any particular case out of turn expeditiously. It is when some extra ordinary circumstance is made out only then it would be appropriate for this Court to exercise its extra ordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In the present case no such circumstances has been mentioned or made out requiring interference of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 7.With aforesaid observation and direction the petition stands dismissed. However, the authorities shall proceed to decide the said matter in accordance with law. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench