IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.8393 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.6.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Sujan Singh ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 and 2. Ms. Surinder Parkash Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.3. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record copy of communication dated 18.6.2025, issued by the Director of School Education, Shimla, Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, states that since petitioner has been adjusted at a station of his choice, present petition may be disposed of as having rendered infructuous. 2. Careful perusal of aforesaid communication substantiates the statement given by the learned Additional Advocate General, which fact has been further acknowledged by Mr. Mukul Sood, learned counsel for the petitioner. - 2 - 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings, accordingly, present petition is disposed of alongwith pending applications if any. June 19, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge