TAUHEED AHMAD SHAH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/2136/2025 · 2025-07-15
Rajnish Kumar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150844 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40262 Court No. - 12 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 2136 of 2025 Appellant :- Tauheed Ahmad Shah Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Irfan Alam,Saniya Ansari Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajnish Kumar,J. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A.for the respondent no.1. Considering the nature of order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to the respondent no.2 is dispensed with.
Learned counsel for the appellant, after arguing at some length, submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and submits that the application may be dismissed as not pressed so that the appellant may appear before the concerned court and seek the benefit of the order of Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in the case of Satendra Kumar Antill Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Others, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825. To which there is no objection by learned AGA. In view of above, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed with liberty as aforesaid. It is needless to say that in case the appellant appears before the concerned court within a period of ten days from today and claims the benefit of the judgment passed in Satendra Kumar Antill Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Others, 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825, the concerned court is to consider the same in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Akanksha Sri/- Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench