Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150840 (ALL)

RAM ASRE v. THE BOARD OF REVENUE U.P. THRU. THE CHAIRMAN / PRESIDENT BOARD OF REVENUE, LKO. AND ANOTHER

A227/4098/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39697 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4098 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Asre Respondent :- The Board Of Revenue U.P. Thru. The Chairman / President Board Of Revenue, Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Bal Keshwar Srivastava,Aniket Srivastav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 /Charmian / President, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow to decide the restoration application bearing an application No. 2354/2025 (Ram Asre Vs. Shankar @ Shankar Lal) U/S 209(J) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in respondent No. 1 is directed decide the aforesaid case on the next date fixed in the matter or in the time bound manner as fixed by this Court. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 /Charmian / President, Board of Revenue, U.P., Lucknow, is directed to decide restoration application bearing an application No. 2354/2025 (Ram Asre Vs. Shankar @ Shankar Lal) U/S 209(J) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 either on the next date fixed or for some reason it cannot be decided on the said date, within four weeks thereafter in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the parties concerned, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench