SMT. RINKI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF CHILD DEVELOPMENT AND NUTRITION U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIA/7496/2025 · 2025-07-14
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150839 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39861 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7496 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Rinki Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Child Development And Nutrition U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Maurya,Kanchan,Pawan Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and Ms.Deepshikha, learned Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf opposite parties 1 to 5. In view of
order being passed, notices to opposite party no.6 stands dispensed with.
2. Present petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India has been filed seeking direction to opposite parties for quashing appointment of opposite party no.6, Smt. Vimlesh, wife of Shailendra Kumar on the post of Anganwadi Worker for the Village in question.
3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the merit list is required to be prepared in terms of paragraph-7 of Government Order dated 21.03.2023 but has not been done in accordance thereof due to which petitioner despite having higher marks, has been incorrectly held disqualified.
4. Learned Chief Standing Counsel has been provided written instructions dated 09.07.2025, which are taken on record and as per which specific calculation pertaining to petitioner and opposite party no.6 has been indicated including the mode and manner in which such marking has been done and as per which opposite party no.6 has obtained 11.42 marks which is higher than 11.26 obtained by petitioner.
5. In such circumstances, it is evident that opposite party no.6 has been selected in terms of aforesaid Government
Order having obtained higher marks than petitioner.
6. Considering aforesaid facts, the petition fails and is dismissed at the admission stage itself. The parties to bear their own costs.
Order Date :- 14.7.2025 kvg/- Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench