Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150838 (ALL)

ASHISH KUMAR TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 11 OTHERS

WRIC/6744/2025 · 2025-07-17

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40869-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6744 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ashish Kumar Tiwari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 11 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avneesh Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shiv Prasad Kushwaha Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Mr. Shiv Prasad Kushwaha, learned Advocate has filed vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 which is taken on record. Heard. If the petitioner raises a dispute regarding the caste status of opposite parties no. 8 to 12, then, the remedy is before the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee. He should approach the said Committee, if he has locus standi and a cause. If the petitioner has earlier moved some application or appeal before the District Magistrate under the Janhit Guarantee Act, then, the District Magistrate would be better advised to refer it to the District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee instead of deciding it himself. The writ petition is disposed of. [Manish Kumar, J.] [Rajan Roy, J.] Order Date :- 17.7.2025 Santosh/- Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench