DR. HAR GYAN PRAKASH (DR. HAR GYAN PRAKASH KUSHWAHA) AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. KRISHI SHIKSHA EVAM ANUSANDHAN VIBHAG LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/7469/2025 · 2025-07-11
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150825 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150825 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39707 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7469 of 2025 Petitioner :- Dr. Har Gyan Prakash (Dr. Har Gyan Prakash Kushwaha) And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Krishi Shiksha Evam Anusandhan Vibhag Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rakesh Chandra Tewari,Yogendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ran Vijay Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 & 5 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 to 4. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that despite the petitioner having retired from the post of Professor, their retiral dues have not been given to them despite the persons similarly circumstanced after retirement having been given the retiral dues.
Learned counsel for the petitioners after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioners may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents no. 1 & 5 and Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.2 to 4 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioners submit a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.3 then the respondent No.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case.
Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench