Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150797 (ALL)

MAHENDRA NATH SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DAIRY DAIRY DEVELOPMENT LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7464/2025 · 2025-07-11

Abdul Moin

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39709 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7464 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mahendra Nath Shukla Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Dairy Dairy Development Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pradeep Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- CSC,Pankaj Patel,Sandeep Sharma,Shanker Lal Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Shanker Lal Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3, 4 & 6 and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5. Notice on behalf of the respondent no. 2 has been accepted by Sri Sandeep Sharma, Advocate. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is being finally decided. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that the respondent no. 2 has failed to make payment of the salary as well as Employee Provident Fund despite the petitioner having retired on 31.12.2022. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing at some length submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent No.2 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which Sri Shanker Lal Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents no. 3, 4 & 6 and Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the respondent no. 5 have no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within ten days from today before the respondent No.2 then the respondent No.2 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the case. It is also provided that in case the petitioner is found entitled for any dues, the same shall be paid to him. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Pachhere/- Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench