RAJEEV SHAH v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY(LAW) CUM LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE, JUSTICE AND LAW DEP
WPMS/3244/2025 · 2025-11-21
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15078 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15078 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10400 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 3244/2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Kishore Rai, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. N.K. Papnai, Standing Counsel, for the State.
(2) Petitioner was appointed as Notary under Notaries Act in the year 2000. His license of practice was renewed from time to time, however, by order dated 12.9.2025, State Government has refused to renew his license of practice on the ground that he has practiced for more than ten years and with a view to give opportunity to young and energetic persons.
(3)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the judgment dated 8.10.2025, rendered in Writ Petition No. 7 of 2025 (MS), therefore, this petition be decided in terms of the said judgment.
(4) Learned State Counsel concedes that the reason for non-renewal of petitioner’s license of practice is the same as was in Writ Petition No. 7 of 2025 (MS). Thus he submits that he has no objection if this petition is decided in terms of the said
judgment.
(5) Accordingly, the writ petition is decided in terms of
judgment dated 8.10.2025, rendered in Writ Petition No. 7 of 2025 (MS).
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
21.11.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.21 13:56:06 +05'30'
2025:UHC:10400