U. Azgar Sheriff, v. Tmt. Kalaiselvi Mohan, I.A.S.,
CONT P/385/2025 · 2025-03-25
R N Manjula, S S Sundar
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15077 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15077 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.03.2025
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S. SUNDAR AND THE HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE R.N. MANJULA Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 and Sub Applications (OS) No.161 of 2025 U.Azgar Sheriff ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Tmt.Kalaiselvi Mohan, I.A.S., The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2.Thiru.S.Venkatesh, The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 3.Thiru.V.Narayanan Sharma, The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. Page 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 4.Tmt.Poonguzhali, The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu. ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India r/w. Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for their willful and deliberate disobedience of the positive directions passed by this Court in W.A.No.1211 of 2022, dated 07.11.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.K.R.Tamil Mani Senior Counsel for Mr.V.Srinivasa Babu For Respondents : Mr.R.Ramanlaal Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader O R D E R (Order of the Court was made by S.S. SUNDAR, J.) This Contempt Petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the
order passed by this Court in W.A.No.1211 of 2022, dated 07.11.2024. Page 2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 2.On the earlier occasion, the 2nd respondent/District Revenue Officer did not appear before this Court despite issuance of notice to all the contemnors. 3.Today, Mr.S.Venkatesh, District Revenue Officer, Kancheepuram, the 2nd respondent, is present before this Court. His presence is recorded. 4.This Court, by order dated 19.03.2025, recorded the undertaking of the learned Additional Advocate General and adjourned the matter today. It is now reported by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Ramanlaal, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents, that the order of this Court had been complied with, and patta had been issued along with sketch and the Revenue records had been mutated accordingly. Page 3 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 5.Recording the submission of the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the respondents reporting compliance, this Contempt Petition is closed. Consequently, connected Sub-Application is closed.
(S.S.S.R., J.) (R.N.M., J.) 25.03.2025 mkn Internet : Yes Index : Yes / No Neutral citation : Yes / No To 1.The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chengalpattu. Page 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 4.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu.
S.S. SUNDAR, J. and R.N. MANJULA, J. mkn Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 Page 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Cont.P.No.385 of 2025 25.03.2025 Page 6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis