YUGUL PRATAP SINGH v. SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER (JUDICIAL), KAISERGANJ, DISTT. BAHRAICH AND OTHERS
A227/4088/2025 · 2025-07-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150766 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39641 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4088 of 2025 Petitioner :- Yugul Pratap Singh Respondent :- Sub Divisional Officer (Judicial), Kaiserganj, Distt. Bahraich And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sadhu Sharan Chaubey,Abha Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich to decide interim injunction application and also for expediting the proceedings of Case No. 2989 of 2025 Computerized Case No. T- 2025081508150302989 U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Yugul Pratap Singh Cs. Vijai Pratap & Others) expeditiously.
4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer for a suitable direction to respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich to consider and decide the Case No. 2989 of 2025 Computerized Case No. T-2025081508150302989 U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Yugul Pratap Singh Cs. Vijai Pratap & Others) in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No. 1 / Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Kaiserganj, District - Bahraich, is directed to decide Case No. T-2025081508150302989 U/S 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Yugul Pratap Singh Cs. Vijai Pratap & Others), expeditiously, say within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.)
Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench