Rani v. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP(MD)/12006/2025 · 2025-07-17
B Pugalendhi
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150761 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150761 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.07.2025
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025 Rani ... Petitioner Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Ambilikkai Police Station, Oddanchatram Taluk, Dindigul District. [Crime No.156 of 2016]
...Respondent Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to issue suitable direction to the trial Court for speedy disposal of the case in CC.No.273 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatram, Dindigul District to dispose of the case on day to day basis within stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sarvagan Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottaichamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025
ORDER The petitioner is an accused in Crime No.155 of 2016. She claims that for the very same incident, she has also lodged a complaint in Crime No.156 of 2016. Though the respondent police have filed the final report in the year 2016, in the case in Crime No.155 of 2016 registered against her, they have filed the final report in her complaint in Crime No.156 of 2016, only in the year 2022. Both cases are pending. Therefore, the petitioner seeks for a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the cases within stipulated time.
2. The learned Government Advocate on instruction submits that in the case in CC No.273 of 2022 there are eight accused and two accused are absconding. Therefore, the trial Court could not proceed. He also submits the case in CC.No.316 of 2016 is adjourned to 24.07.2025. 3.This Court considered the rival submissions made. 4.The petitioner seeks a direction to conclude the trial in CC.No. 273 of 2022 within a stipulated time. It is seen that the case in CC.No. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025 361 of 2016 against the petitioner is also pending for several years. Therefore, the learned Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatram, Dindigul shall find out the possibility of conducting simultaneous trial in both cases. In case of warrants are not executed, necessary directions shall be issued to execute the warrants and the trial in both cases be proceeded. This petition is disposed of accordingly.
17.07.2025 DSK To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Oddanchatram, Dindigul. 2.The Inspector of Police, Ambilikkai Police Station, Oddanchatram Taluk, Dindigul District. 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025 B.PUGALENDHI,J DSK CrlOP(MD)No.12006 of 2025
17.07.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis