APHC010191082013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13614/2013 Between: 1. M/S M. KURMA RAO & CO.,, 25-1-1120/1, HIG-32, VUDA COLONY, PEDAGANTYADA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530044 REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR M. KURMA RAO ...PETITIONER AND 1. M/S RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, (A GOVT OF INDIA UNDERTAKING), VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLAT, VISAKHAPATNAM-530031 REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN & MANAGING DIRECTOR. 2. M/S RASHTRIYA ISPAT NIGAM LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM STEEL PLANT, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530031 REP. BY ITS ASST. GENERAL MANAGER (PROJECTS)-CONTRACT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue an order notice and declare that the order passed under Ref.VSP/CONT/EXPN/C-126/2514 dt. 15-03-2012 issued by respt.No.2 debarring the petitioner from having further business dealings with the Respondent for a periods of five years with effect from 14-03-2012 is wholly illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice and also Art. 14 of the Constitution of India consequently set-aside the same by issuance of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or direction or directions as the Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16684 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order under Ref. VSP/CONT/EXPN/C-126/2514 dt.15.3.2013 issued by Respondent No.2 herein pending disposal of the W.P. and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D RAVISHANKAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. VIVEK CHANDRA SEKHAR S 2. V RAVINDER RAO The Court made the following order: Since there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter was listed 23.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the writ petition being listed today under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the forenoon or in the afternoon. It seems the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 3. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 26.06.2025 IKN THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 13614 of 2013 Date: 26.06.2025 IKN