RAMVILASH v. ADDL. COMMISSIONER (JUDICIAL AYODHYA DIVISION), AYODHYA AND 13 OTHERS
A227/4102/2025 · 2025-07-11
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150749 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39548 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4102 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ramvilash Respondent :- Addl. Commissioner (Judicial Ayodhya Division), Ayodhya And 13 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Pathak,Shiv Kumar Singh,Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the proposed order notice to private respondents are dispensed with.
3. By means of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India a prayer has been made for expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 3258/2024 and Computerized Case No. C202404000003258, U/S 24(2) Revenue Court Filed by the respondent No. 2 to 4 (Dinesh Kumar and otehr Vs. Ramvilas & others), pending before respondent No. Additional Commissioner (Judicial Ayodhya Division) Ayodhya.
4. It is urged that though the matter is being listed but for one reason or the other, the appealis not being decided.
5. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that trial Court/authority concerned may be directed to decide the appeal in a time bound manner.
6. At this stage, no ground for urgency is made out by the petitioner, hence, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the trial Court/competent authority and move an appropriate application detailing urgency for expeditious disposal of aforesaid appeal, within two weeks from today, and in case, if such an application is moved, the trial Court/competent authority shall consider and decide the same within three weeks thereafter, and in case any case for urgency is made out by the petitioner, it shall pass appropriate orders thereupon, in accordance with law.
7. It is made clear that this Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merit and the Court/authority concerned shall decide the matter strictly in accordance with law.
8. With the aforesaid observations, the petition is disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025/Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench