Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40382 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4116 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ravindra Kumar Verma Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Chairman And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mohan Singh Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Sri Mohan Singh for respondent No.5. 2. In light of the order proposed to be passed notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 3. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner's father namely Rampal S/o Rambali filed an application under Section 33/39 of U.P. Land Revenue Act in respect of Gata No. 1183/0.2024 hectares. In respect to aforesaid gata, different Courts has passed decree in favour of father of petitioner, but mistakenly name of father of petitioner could not be entered in the revenue records against the said Gata. Father of petitioner died on 01.06.2017. 4. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent no. 4 filed revision in 2024 before Board of Revenue against order dated 12.07.2002, which was passed in favour of petitioner. The said revision was dismissed by the Board of Revenue by order dated 28.01.2025 on the ground of limitation. It is further submitted that petitioner's father was granted lease over the said land in the khatauni of Fasli year 1359 on the basis of lease granted on 03.05.1946, in pursuance thereof an order has been passed on 05.09.1952 by the authorities concerned. Further order dated 28.01.2025 and 12.07.2002 have not been challenged before any Court or forum by respondent no. 4. Prayer has been made by the petitioner to direct respondent no. 3 - Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Kadipur, Sultanpur to enter name of petitioner in the revenue records in pursuance to order dated 12.07.2002, passed by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Kadipur, Sultanpur. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, submits that the petitioner has equally efficacious and alternate remedy of executing the orders of revenue court as per Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual where an order of revenue authority can be executed. 6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that liberty may be granted to the petitioner to approach the competent authority under Para 460 of U.P. Revenue Court Manual for execution of the orders passed by the Prescribed Authority as well as of the other authorities. 7. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach competent authority by moving appropriate application under para 460 of Revenue Court Manual to execute the orders of the revenue authorities. In case, such an application is moved within two weeks from today the same shall be disposed of expeditiously. Order Date :- 14.7.2025 A. Verma (Alok Mathur, J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench