Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150732 (MAD)

M.Soosai Backiyam v. The District Collector

WP(MD)/19676/2025 · 2025-07-21

A D Maria Clete, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.07.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 M.Soosai Backiyam ... Petitioner vs. 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Thoothukudi. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 5.Luruth Bellarmine Chinnarani 6.Maria Premalatha 7.Palraj ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to complete the enquiry proceedings in Aa7/5734/2019, dated 12.07.2019 on the basis of the representation of the petitioner dated 31.05.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Manimuthu For RR 1 to 4 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) The relief sought for in the Writ Petition is to direct the second respondent to complete the enquiry proceedings. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 2.The petitioner filed an application seeking to cancel the sale deeds executed by the fifth respondent in favour of some third parties. Since the said application is pending before the second respondent, the present Writ Petition came to be instituted. 3.The learned Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4, on instructions, submitted that the application is pending before the third respondent. 4.It is needless to state that pending applications are to be disposed of in a systematic manner by the competent authority, in the order of seniority. Preference to dispose of the applications can be granted in exceptional cases by recording valid reasons. Obtaining an order from the writ Court would not provide any priority, since such orders may affect the disposal of other cases, which are all pending for a long time. Therefore, the case of the petitioner is also to be taken into consideration and to be disposed of in the order of seniority by following the prescribed procedures. 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 5.With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. [S.M.S.,J.] & [A.D.M.C.,J.] 21.07.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes ps 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 To 1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Thoothukudi. 2.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the District Revenue Officer, Thoothukudi. 3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thoothukudi. 4.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM , J. and DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE , J. ps ORDER MADE IN W.P(MD)No.19676 of 2025 DATED : 21.07.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis