Lakhan Paswan @ Lakhan pasna v. The State of Bihar
CWJC/2058/2025 · 2025-02-13
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15071 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15071 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2058 of 2025 ====================================================== Lakhan Paswan @ Lakhan pasna, Son of Madan Paswan @ Mohan Paswan, resident of Village- Ratnara, Ganga Bigha Tola, P.O. - Rattibigha, P.S. Bodh Gaya, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Collector, Gaya, District- Gaya.
3. The Additional Collector, Gaya.
4. The Deputy Collector of Land Reforms, Sadar, District- Gaya.
5. The Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya Anchal, District - Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Upendra Prasad Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Standing Counsel (11) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 13-02-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s): (i) For an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of Mandamus, directing and commanding the respondent authorities, specially the Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya (Respondent No. 5) to mutate the land in the name of the petitioner situated in Mauza: Ratnara Ganga Bridge Tola, under Bodh Gaya Circle, District: Gaya bearing Cadestral Khata No. 186, Survey Plot No. 542 area
atna High Court CWJC No.2058 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 2/3 15 acres, which is settled by way of Bandobansti in the name of the petitioner's father but during process of revisional survey, the same has been entered as Anabad Bihar Sarkar, which was found illegal and accordingly directed to be corrected by the judgment dated 30.08.2012 by the Sub. Judge, IV, Gaya in Case No. 52/2011/308/2011, which was confirmed by the judgment dated 04.12.2023 passed by Additional District Judge-III, Gaya in Title Appeal No. 12 of 2013 (The State of Bihar & Another Vs. Mandan Gorait) but the same has not been corrected the demand register. (ii) And for any other relief/relief(s) for which the petitioner is found entitled in the
facts and circumstances of the case.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner filed Title Suit No. 308 of 2011 which was
decreed in his favour and the defendants filed Title Appeal No. 12 of 2013 in the court of Additional District & Sessions Judge- III, Gaya which was dismissed vide judgment and decree dated 04-12-2023. Thereafter, the petitioner filed Mutation Application on the basis of decree passed by the civil court in favour of the petitioner. The mutation application has been filed by the petitioner on 08-06-2024 which is still pending with the
atna High Court CWJC No.2058 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2025 3/3 Mutation Authorities.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner makes a prayer for expeditiously disposal of the mutation application.
4. If it is so the Circle Officer, Bodh Gaya (respondent No. 5) is directed to dispose of the mutation application filed by the petitioner as early as possible.
5. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition stands disposed of.
A.K.V.//- (Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) U