Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150701 (ALL)

PREM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.

BAIL/6402/2025 · 2025-07-15

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:40418 Court No. - 11 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6402 of 2025 Applicant :- Prem Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Singh,Rahul Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard Shri Rahul Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Shri Surendra Singh, learned AGA for the State. 2. The present applicant is in jail since 22.05.2025 in Case Crime no. 167 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 333, 351(2), 352, 324(2), 105, 3(5) of BNS at Police Station Sarojni Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the present applicant has been falsely implicated as he has not committed any offence as alleged. 4. Attention has been drawn towards the impugned First Information Report, wherein, the specific allegation of beating and assault has been attributed to 4 named accused persons and 3 to 4 unknown persons. The present applicant is named in the First Information Report. While recording statement under section 180 BNS, the complainant has not levelled any specific allegation against the present applicant. The present applicant has no prior criminal history. Learned counsel has further stated that the co-accused Subhash has already been enlarged on bail by this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 6254 of 2025 vide order dated 07.07.2025. The applicant undertakes that if he is enlarged on bail, he shall abide by all terms and conditions of the bail order, shall not misuse the liberty of bail and shall cooperate in the trial proceedings. 5. Learned AGA for the State has also opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submission of the learned counsel for the applicant. 6. Without entering into merits of the issue, considering the arguments of learned counsel for the parties; contents and allegations of the FIR and the fact that the present applicant is languishing in jail since 22.05.2025; co-accused Subhash has already been enlarged on bail; and undertaking of the applicant that he shall cooperate in the trial proceedings and shall not misuse the liberty of bail, I find it appropriate to release the applicant on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8. Let applicant- Prem be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he / she shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him / her under Section 269 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 84 of B.N.S.S., 2023 is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him / her, in accordance with law, under Section 208 of the B.N.S., 2023. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of B.N.S.S., 2023. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him / her in accordance with law. (v) The applicant shall not leave the country without previous permission of the Court. . (Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J.) Order Date :- 15.7.2025 Arnima Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARNIMA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench