Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39652 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5610 of 2025 Applicant :- Ibrar @ Abrar Ahmad And 6 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. A.C.S. /Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Yogesh Kumar Mishra,Dharmendra Kumar Yadav,Shraddha Chaturvedi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J. 1. Heard Sri Yogesh Kumar Mishra, the learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Hans Raj Verma, the learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Shashank Kumar Shukla, the learned counsel for opposite party No.2 and perused the record. 2. By means of the instant application filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., the applicants have sought quashing of the entire proceedings in Case Crime No.102/2018 lodged in P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur U/S 147,323,504,427 I.P.C as well as Criminal Case No. 2668/2018, (Now as 7737/2018) 'State vs. Ibrar and others' pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Sultanpur, District- Sultanpur. 3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that they have settled their dispute amicably outside the Court and they have arrived at the compromise. Compromise entered into between the parties have been placed on record as Annexure-4 to the petition. The parties have confirmed the terms of the compromise. Compromise has been verified between the parties by Judicial Magistrate, Shrawasti vide order dated 25.03.2025 in compliance of the order dated 10.03.2025 passed by this Court in Application u/s 482 No.2218 of 2025. 4. Opposite party No.2 does not have any objection, if the impugned proceedings are quashed against the applicants. 5. I have considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 6. Considering the fact that the dispute between the parties is personal in nature and ratio laid down by the Supreme Court in the cases of B. S. Joshi and others versus State of Haryana and another :(2003) 4 SCC 675, Nikhil Merchant versus C.B.I. and another : (2008) 9 SCC 677, Manoj Sharma versus State and others : (2008) 16 SCC 1, Gian Singh versus Station of Punjab: (2010) 15 SCC 118 and Narinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another: (2014) 6 SCC 466, it would be appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case to quash the criminal proceedings as continuance of the criminal proceedings would be an exercise in futility. 7. 7. In view of the fact that the parties have settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise arrived at between the parties and law laid down by the Supreme Court of India, the present application is allowed and the entire proceedings in Case Crime No.102/2018 lodged in P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur U/S 147,323,504,427 I.P.C as well as Criminal Case No. 2668/2018, (Now as 7737/2018) 'State vs. Ibrar and others' pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Sultanpur, District- Sultanpur are quashed. . (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025 -Amit K- Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench