Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39585 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7454 of 2025 Petitioner :- Nirmal Rai Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Forest Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tushar Bhushan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard Mr. Tushar Bhushan, learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties. 2. By means of present writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction to State respondents to set aside/quash the oral order of termination dated 15.05.2025, terminating the services of the petitioner on Class IV post. 3. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that petitioner was appointed in July, 2001 as a Daily Wager on Group D Class IV post, in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, North Kheri, Buffer Zone, Pallia Range, Lakhimpur Kheri and thereafter from July, 2001 till 14.05.2025, the petitioner discharged his duties on the post of Watcher. It has further been submitted that when the petitioner reported for his duty on 15.05.2025 in Dudhwa Tiger Reserve, North Kheri, Pallia Range, Lakhimpur Kheri, he was not allowed and permitted to discharge his duties and was not allowed to mark his attendance in the attendance register. 4. He further submits that no work is being taken from the petitioner since 15.05.2025 till date, and the petitioner is not being allowed to discharge his duties on Class IV post, even though the petitioner is always willing and ready to discharge his duties on his post but no work is being taken from the petitioner on Class IV. 3. In this regard, it has been submitted that petitioner has given a representation dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure No. 2) which is pending consideration and has not been decided so far. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submit that the grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondents for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure No. 2 to the writ petition) expeditiously, say, within a period of six weeks by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law from the date a copy of this order is produced before him and communicate the decision to the petitioner. Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench