CR-5970-2016 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 232 Jagroop Singh Gill Avtar Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. tenant assails Controller, Moga, whereby the ejectment petition filed by the respondent landlord under Section 1949, was Appellate Authority, vide impugned order dated 2. hearing after the year 2023. 3. petition was dismissed for non Court vide order dated behalf of the petitioner, the same was restored vide order dated on 27.11.2019, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was passed by a co 2016 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-5970 Date of Decision: Jagroop Singh Gill Versus Avtar Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA None. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present revision petition the petitioner assails the order dated 09.05.2014 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Moga, whereby the ejectment petition filed by the respondent under Section 13 of the East Punjab 1949, was allowed; and the said order was also Appellate Authority, vide impugned order dated The matter pertains to the year hearing after the year 2023. Notice is yet to be issued in the present case. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) reveals that earlier this was dismissed for non-prosecution by a co vide order dated 28.09.2018, on account of non behalf of the petitioner. Subsequently, upon an ap , the same was restored vide order dated 27.11.2019, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was a co-ordinate Bench of this Court: “Counsel for the petitioner has challe as passed by Rent Controller under Section 13 of the East IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 5970-2016 (O&M) Date of Decision: 07.08.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA By way of filing the present revision petition the petitioner- the order dated 09.05.2014 passed by the learned Rent Controller, Moga, whereby the ejectment petition filed by the respondent- of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, said order was also affirmed by the learned Appellate Authority, vide impugned order dated 01.08.2016. The matter pertains to the year 2016 and has come up for Notice is yet to be issued in the present case. sheet(s) reveals that earlier this revision prosecution by a co-ordinate Bench of this , on account of non-appearance on . Subsequently, upon an application moved by the , the same was restored vide order dated 19.07.2019. Thereafter, 27.11.2019, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was this Court:- Counsel for the petitioner has challenged the order passed by Rent Controller under Section 13 of the East the order dated 09.05.2014 passed by the learned Rent Urban Rent Restriction Act, has come up for revision of this appearance on plication moved by the Thereafter, 27.11.2019, when this case was listed for hearing, following order was nged the order passed by Rent Controller under Section 13 of the East RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.08 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CR-5970-2016 (O&M) 4. for the petitioner had last 02 dates of hearing, 27.07.2023 and 21.11.2023, the present revision was adjourned at the written request of learned counsel for the petitioner and on account of non respectively the case having been called twice. 5. has exhibited an utterly casual attitude in litigation. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. O casual and careless approach. It counsel is Court is left with no other option except to non-prosecution 6. 7. 07.08.2025 rishu 2016 (O&M) -2- Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 subsequently affirmed by the appellate authority on 01.08.2016. This matter has been pending in Court since then as on date no arguments have been addressed. Let this Court be informed as to whether the grievance of the petitioner still survive. Adjourned to 13.02.2020. On the next date of hearing i.e. 16.02.2023, learned counsel for the petitioner had again sought time to get instructions. last 02 dates of hearing, 27.07.2023 and 21.11.2023, the present revision was adjourned at the written request of learned counsel for the petitioner and on account of non-appearance on behalf of the petitio respectively. Today, again the petitioner had gone un the case having been called twice. A bare reading of the above facts shows that the exhibited an utterly casual attitude in tion. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to interest of justice. On the other hand, the petitioner has casual and careless approach. It is clear that neither the seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to prosecution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 subsequently appellate authority on 01.08.2016. This matter has been pending in Court since then as on een addressed. Let this Court be informed as to whether the grievance Adjourned to 13.02.2020.” On the next date of hearing i.e. 16.02.2023, learned counsel sought time to get instructions. Further, on the last 02 dates of hearing, 27.07.2023 and 21.11.2023, the present revision was adjourned at the written request of learned counsel for the petitioner appearance on behalf of the petitioner, Today, again the petitioner had gone un-represented, despite A bare reading of the above facts shows that the petitioner exhibited an utterly casual attitude in his pursuit of the present tion. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the Court has been expended in affording opportunities to the petitioner in the petitioner has adopted an utterly is clear that neither the petitioner nor his seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss present revision, for application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 subsequently Let this Court be informed as to whether the grievance On the next date of hearing i.e. 16.02.2023, learned counsel on the last 02 dates of hearing, 27.07.2023 and 21.11.2023, the present revision was adjourned at the written request of learned counsel for the petitioner , , despite petitioner pursuit of the present tion. It is to be appreciated that very valuable public time of the in the adopted an utterly seriously interested in pursuing the present matter. Thus, this , for RISHU KATARIA 2025.08.08 18:02 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.