ANURAG SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
A482/5638/2025 · 2025-07-16
Subhash Vidyarthi
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150687 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41164 Court No. - 15 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 5638 of 2025 Applicant :- Anurag Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shradha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Heard Ms. Shradha, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Satyendra Srivastava, learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the file, including the Annexures attached therewith.
2. The present petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed with a prayer to allow the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties in one case which should be sufficient in three cases in which the applicant has been granted bail.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submit that it is impossible for the applicant to submit separate sureties in each case in which he has been granted bail. The learned counsel further submits that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases. Despite the trial Court granting him bail, the applicant is still in jail inasmuch as the applicant being a poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases, details of which are as follows:- (i) Case Crime No. 0385 of 2022, under Sections 504, 506, 323 IPC, related to Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow. (ii) Case Crime No. 0046 of 2025, under Sections 140(2), 115(2), 352 BNS, related to Police Station- P.G.I., District- Lucknow.
(iii) Case Crime No. 38 of 2025, under Sections 140(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, related to Police Station- Sushant Golf City, District- Lucknow.
4. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh [SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Hon'ble Apex Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the applicant to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases.
5. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed of and it is directed that the applicant shall furnish a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case which shall be treated to be valid in other two cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. Order Date :- 16.7.2025 (Manoj K.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench