Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15067 (UTT)

RAHUL ARYA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/1043/2025 · 2025-11-20

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10346 WPCRL No.1043 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Siddhartha Bankoti, learned counsel for the Petitioner through VC. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned DAG, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. Mr. Baljeet Rajouriya, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Trilok Chandra, learned counsel for the private Respondent. 4. Learned State Counsel has given a statement before this Court that in the present matter charge-sheet has been submitted before the court concerned and the matter has become infructuous. This fact is being admitted by the learned counsel for the Petitioner. 5. In view of the above statement, the writ petition is dismissed as having infructuous. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 20.11.2025 Nitesh/