DR. GHANSHYAM JOSHI S/O SHRIVIRDHI CHAND SHARMA v. AKHIL ARORA, ADDITIONALCHIEF SECRETARY
CCP/339/2025 · 2025-05-09
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, Mukesh Rajpurohit
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15065 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 15065 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:19589-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 339/2025 Dr. Ghanshyam Joshi S/o Shrivirdhi Chand Sharma, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Plot No-88 Mohini Villa Bhagchand Soni Nagar Foy Sagar,foy Sagar Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Akhil Arora, Additionalchief Secretary, Department Of Finance(Rules Division), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Finance (Rules Devision), Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur,rajasthan.
3. Bhawani Singh Detha Principal Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
4. Sawan Kumar Chayal, Dy. Secretary, Ayurved And Bhartiya
Chikitsa
Vibhag,government
Of Rajasthan,government Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan.
5. Dr. Anand Kumar Sharma Director, Ayurved And Bhartiya Chikitsa Vibhag,government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan.
6. Dr. Hanuman Meena, Deputy Director, Ayurved Vibhag, Ajmer, Government Of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitesh Kumar Garg For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Samee Khan & Ms. Sunita Meena HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 09/05/2025
1. Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG places before this Court a copy of communication dated 22.04.2025 of the Directorate of
[2025:RJ-JP:19589-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-339/2025] Ayurveda addressed to Director State Insurance and Provident Fund Department seeking their response.
2. We are of the view that the issue raised in this petition does not constitute an issue of contempt.
3. This contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to file separate petition.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),CJ NAVAL Gandhi/Gaurav/16