2025:JHHC:14293 Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 4347 of 2025 ----- 1. Gulam Sarwar, aged about 36 years, Son of Abdullah Ansari, Resident of Village Tasprar, P.O. Jarhi, P.S. Dandai, District- Garhwa, Jharkhand. 2. Jalil Ansari, aged about 30 years, Son of Shahabuddin Ansari, Resident of Village Karkoma, P.O. Hasandag, P.S. Meral, District-Garhwa, Jharkhand. .......... Petitioners. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand .......... Opp. Party. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Lukesh Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. ----- Order No.02 Date: 29th May, 2025 The petitioners are accused for the offences punishable under Sections 317(5) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 12(1) of the Jharkhand Bovine Animal Prohibition of Slaughter Act, 2005. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case and have not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. It has been alleged that the petitioners and co-accused person Shamsher Ansari were taking away 6 bovine animals for slaughter purpose. It is further submitted that the petitioners are poor labourers and they were apprehended at the instance of the villagers merely on suspicion. The petitioners have no criminal antecedents as has been stated in Paragraph No.6 of the present bail application. The petitioners are in judicial custody since 12.04.2025. Hence, they may be given the privilege of regular bail. 3. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the petitioners’ prayer for regular bail. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, considering the materials available on record as well as keeping in view that the petitioners are in judicial custody since 12.04.2025, I am inclined to enlarge them on bail. 2025:JHHC:14293 Page | 2 5. Accordingly, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Garhwa in connection with Garhwa P.S. Case No. 180 of 2025, subject to the condition that the petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall present as and when required by the learned Trial Court, failing which the said court is at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Amar/Sandeep