Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150627 (ALL)

SHASHILATA MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. BAL VIKAS AWAM PUSTAHAR DEPTT. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/7396/2025 · 2025-07-10

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39258 Court No. - 18 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 7396 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shashilata Maurya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Bal Vikas Awam Pustahar Deptt. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dileep Kumar Tiwari,Md.Khurshed Ahmad Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manish Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties no. 1 to 5. 2. In view of order being passed, notice to opposite party no. 6 stands dispensed with. 3. Petition has been filed seeking a direction to concerned authority for decision on petitioner's representation dated 20.05.2025 whereby objection has been raised to appointment of opposite party no.6 on the post of Aganwadi Worker in the village concerned since allegedly the said opposite party no.6 does not belong to the same ward and is therefore ineligible for appointment. 4. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, opposite party no. 3 i.e. District Program Officer, District Amethi or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of two weeks from the date a certified copy of this order produced before the said authority after affording of hearing to opposite party no.6 i.e. Renu Yadav W/o Ram Kumar. Petitioner shall annex a copy of the representation dated 20.05.2025 alongwith certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Satish Digitally signed by :- SATISH KUMAR BHARATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench