Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150622 (ALL)

GHANSHYAM AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. LKO AND 6 OTHERS

WRIC/6619/2025 · 2025-07-22

Manish Kumar, Rajan Roy

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:41862-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6619 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ghanshyam And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dinesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sriniwas Bajpai Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Manish Kumar,J. Heard. The petitioners allege interference in possession of Gata Nos. 199 and 200 by the opposite parties, however, the Standing Counsel for the State and Sri Sriniwas Bajpai, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opposite Party Nos.6 and 7 i.e. Nagar Palika conderned say that Gata No.199 is Banjar land though the Gata No.200 is Bhumidhari land and in the garb of the said land the petitioners are encroaching upon the Banjar land. In view of the above, we dispose of the writ petition with direction to the petitioners to get the boundaries of their gata bearing no.200 demarcated under Section 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 and thereafter based for its result, if they find that there is any interference on the said land on which they are co- sharers alongwith others, they can initiate appropriate proceedings as per law. Apart from it, we cannot give any other direction. . [Manish Kumar,J.] [Rajan Roy,J.] Order Date :- 22.7.2025 S. Kumar Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench