[2025:RJ-JP:23372] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5456/2025 Saurabh S/o Harimohan, R/o Asthal, At Present Gerai, Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5026/2025 Saurabh Goswami S/o Babulal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gairai, Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Pal Jadoun For State : Mr. Fateh Ram Meena Mr. Akash Sharma Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 20/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.34/2025 registered with the Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli for offence under Sections 318(4) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 67 of the Information Technology Act. [2025:RJ-JP:23372] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5456/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case and they are in custody since 25.03.2025. Learned counsel further submits that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the accused-petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery. Learned counsel also submits that the trial of the case is likely to take considerable time to conclude, therefore, the accused- petitioners may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material made available on record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter and the petitioners are in custody since 25.03.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, both the bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which [2025:RJ-JP:23372] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5456/2025] the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the accused-persons of particular areas, who are involved in the online fraud, after their release from a criminal case, will celebrate their release in public. Hence, taking into consideration the aforesaid aspect, a condition is imposed that the accused- petitioners shall not celebrate their release in public and if they are found to be involved in celebrating their release in public, the State shall be at liberty to move the application for cancellation of their bail. 8. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in the connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /4-5