PRAMOD KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/6395/2025 · 2025-07-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150612 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150612 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39403 Court No. - 14 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6395 of 2025 Applicant :- Pramod Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Tiwari,Sanjay Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records. 2. The instant application has been filed seeking release of the applicant on bail in FIR No.47 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Dewa, District Barabanki. 3. The aforesaid case has been registered on the basis of an F.I.R. lodged on 20.01.2023 against four persons, including the applicant, stating that the informant had purchased a piece of agricultural land by means of a sale deed dated 16.07.2019 through the co-accused, Ram Naresh @ Mithlesh who was a broker in the deal. The applicant has witnessed execution of the sale deed. Later on the informant came to know that the sale deed had been executed by some imposter. 4. In the statement of the informant recorded under Section 161 Cr.P.C., he stated that after execution of the sale deed, he and his brother Lalji had got their names mutated in the revenue records, but later on he came to know that the owner of the property lives abroad. He has further stated that he received summons from the Civil Court in the previous year. Thereafter he has filed a suit for cancellation of the sale deed. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that by means of the order dated 25.07.2023 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.9317 of 2023, co-accused Ram Naresh @ Mithlesh has been enlarged on bail. 6. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 7. In the affidavit filed in support of bail application it has been stated that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated in the present case and he has no criminal history. 8. The learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but he could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter. 9.
Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and keeping in view the fact that co-accused Ram Naresh @ Mithlesh has been enlarged on bail, I am of the view that the aforesaid facts are sufficient for making out a case for enlargement of the applicant on bail in the aforesaid crime. 10. Accordingly, this bail application stands allowed on the grounds of parity. 11. Let the applicant-Pramod Kumar be released on bail in FIR No.47 of 2023, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B I.P.C., registered at Police Station Dewa, District Barabanki on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. 12. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. Order Date :- 10.7.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench