SUKHBEER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/10097/2022 · 2025-09-22
Irshad Ali
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150601 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 150601 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10097 of 2022 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE IRSHAD ALI, J.
1. Ms. Ankita Tripathi, learned A.G.A. is present.
2. Seen the status report dated 13.9.2024 of the court below, whereby it has been reported that Sessions Trial No.36 of 2018, Case Crime No.01 of 2018 under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and Section 3/4 of POCSO Act, Police Station Kumarganj, District Ayodhya has been decided vide order dated 6.10.2023, therefore, the present bail application has rendered infructuous and it is hereby rejected. September 22, 2025 Gautam Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vivek Kumar, Ram Prakash Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Irshad Ali,J.) Sukhbeer .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM TECKCHANDANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench