Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 15060 (JHR)

RAM SAHU ALIAS RAM KUMAR SAHU v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5380/2025 · 2025-07-03

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:17810] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5380 of 2025 Ram Sahu @ Ram Kumar Sahu aged about 46 Years S/O Late Charan Sahu @ Ram Charan Sahu R/O Village- Kuruchdega P.O. & P.S.- Bano District-Simdega (Jharkhand). … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. K.S. Nanda , Adv. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha , Addl. PP. 02 / 03.07.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with S.T. case no. 146 (A) of 2007 arising out of Bano P. S. case no. 09 of 2007 (G.R. case no. 104 of 2007) instituted under Sections 302, 34 of the IPC. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of the common intention with the co-accused persons, has committed murder of Madhav Singh, Ramkishor Ram and Chamru Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and charge has been framed and there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. Drawing attention of the court to the judgment passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Simdega in S.T. no. 146 of 2007 (A-1) dated 14.06.2018 that in the said case, the co-accused Lalit Baraik @ Ranga who faced the trial, has been acquitted as the witnesses examined in the case stated that they did not know as to who murdered the said Madhav Singh, Ramkishor Ram and Chamru Singh and were declared hostile. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 10.02.2025 , as mentioned in para 1 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted on regular bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for regular bail . Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additonal Sessions Judge-1, Simdega in connection with S.T. case no. 146 (A) of 2007 arising out of Bano P. S. case no. 09 of 2007 (G.R. case no. 104 of 2007) with the condition that the petitioner will not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Smita/-