Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 150559 (ALL)

SHIV KUMAR PATHAK v. SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, TEHSIL TARABGANJ, GONDA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/4100/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:39575 Court No. - 6 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Kumar Pathak Respondent :- Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tarabganj, Gonda And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar Pandey,Shitla Prasad Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Gupta Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents are dispensed with. 3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tarabganj, District - Gonda to decide the Case No. RST/7633/2025, Computerized Case No. T202508300607633 (Shiv Kumar Pathak Vs. Siyaram and others) u/s 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 expeditiously. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent No.1/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tarabganj, District - Gonda, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits, respondent No.1/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil - Tarabganj, District - Gonda, is directed to decide Case No. RST/7633/2025, Computerized Case No. T202508300607633 (Shiv Kumar Pathak Vs. Siyaram and others) u/s 24 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment. 7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances. 8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 11.7.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench